DocketNumber: No. 26054
Citation Numbers: 92 Ohio Law. Abs. 203
Judges: Donahue, Doyle, Eighth, Hunsicker, Ninth, Seventh
Filed Date: 3/14/1963
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/21/2022
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas to the effect that a decision of the Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, was “unlawful, unreasonable and against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
The function of this court, in review of the Common Pleas Court judgment, is, not to substitute its judgment for that of the Common Pleas Court, but to determine if the Common Pleas Court was in error in its judgment.
Two errors in the judgment are assigned:
(1) It is contrary to law; and (2) It is against the weight of the evidence.
The facts behind this controversy are briefly as follows: Plaintiffs-appellees, employees of long standing, were fired in
The question which the Board of Review had to determine and which the Common Pleas Court later had to review, was whether or not the firings were for just cause as set forth in the Unemployment Compensation Statutes, thus eliminating any claim for unemployment compensation. The Board of Review determined that the company fired for just cause upon the simple assertion by the union that these employees were delinquent in their dues and therefore should be fired.
The Common Pleas Court found that the employer was not justified in accepting the union’s bald statement, that some inquiry should have been made, and that, in the absence of any such inquiry, the firings were not for just cause or that the manifest weight of the evidence did not show them to be so.
The Common Pleas Court’s duties in this appeal are defined by Section 4141.28 (N), Revised Code. The court, in its judgment, followed the statute, as it applied it to the evidence before it.
It should be noted here, that a court speaks through its journal entry, not through any opinion that may be written to explain the court’s reasoning. The court’s reasoning may be completely wrong. That will not affect its judgment, if the judgment itself is in conformity to law.
Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas must be and hereby is affirmed.