DocketNumber: No. 8168
Citation Numbers: 210 N.E.2d 746, 3 Ohio App. 2d 337
Judges: <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Filed Date: 8/24/1965
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
In the within case, the petitioner, John A. Kott, appears to be "a prisoner in custody under sentence and *Page 338
claiming a right to be released" from the custody of E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio Penitentiary, respondent, within the meaning of the newly-enacted Section
It further appears that the petitioner's claims as ground for his release, "that there was such a denial or infringement of his rights as to render the judgment [sentence] void or voidable under the Ohio Constitution or the Constitution of the United States," was within the meaning of Section
That being the case, it appears that the petitioner herein has a newly-created right available to him under the provisions of Sections
There is, of course, no question that this court is vested under the Constitution with full power to entertain petitions for writs of habeas corpus. However, until a petitioner has exhausted the immediate and direct remedies available to him under the provisions of Amended Senate Bill No. 383 in a case such as this, justice will usually be best served in the trial court. *Page 339
Therefore, the petition at this time is dismissed, but such dismissal will in no way prevent renewal of the application after the petitioner has exhausted remedies as provided in Amended Senate Bill No. 383.
Petition dismissed.
BRYANT, P. J., DUFFEY and TROOP, JJ., concur.