DocketNumber: No. 23400
Citation Numbers: 123 N.E.2d 544, 97 Ohio App. 489, 69 Ohio Law. Abs. 286
Judges: <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Filed Date: 1/19/1955
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
The defendant-appellant in the above entitled cause was found guilty of murder in the second degree upon the verdict of a jury, after trial on an indictment charging him with the crime of murder in the first degree.
The defendant is now prosecuting an appeal on questions of law, seeking to reverse the judgment and has filed this motion asking a stay of the judgment pending the hearing of the appeal on its merits and his release on bail during such period of time. This court has granted that part of the motion seeking to stay execution of the judgment during the appeal and will give consideration now to his request to be admitted to bail until the appeal is determined on its merits.
It is a well settled principle of law that after a judgment of guilty in a criminal action a defendant is not entitled to bail pending appeal, as a matter of right. In the case of In reHalsey,
"1. Section 9 of the Ohio Bill of Rights guarantees the right to bail only before judgment of conviction in the trial court.
"2. Section 13453-1, General Code, denying accused persons the right to bail after judgment in the trial court where the punishment is imprisonment for life, is not unconstitutional."
The authority of the Court of Appeals to suspend the execution of sentence and admit a defendant to bail after conviction in a felony case, and after notice of appeal has been given whereby this court acquires *Page 491
jurisdiction of the case, is to be found in two sections of the Revised Code, to wit, Section
Section
Section
The crime of which this defendant has been found guilty is, under the Constitution of Ohio, a bailable offense. Section 9, Article I, provides:
"All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offences where the proof is evident, or the presumption great. Excessive bail shall not be required; nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
It is clear, therefore, that where a defendant has *Page 492 been found guilty of a crime for which the punishment provided is life imprisonment neither the trial court nor the appellate court can admit the defendant to bail pending appeal.
It is argued by the defendant that because of the indeterminate sentence law (Section
As indicated above, the statutory law of the state prohibits either the trial court or the reviewing court to which an appeal is taken from extending the privilege of bail pending appeal to one found guilty of a crime for which the punishment provided by law is life imprisonment.
For this reason, the defendant's motion seeking release on bail until the hearing of his appeal on its merits is overruled.
Motion overruled.
HURD, P. J., KOVACHY and SKEEL, JJ., concur. *Page 493