DocketNumber: No. 02-CA-11-2.
Judges: <italic>BOGGINS, J.</italic>
Filed Date: 10/4/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
{¶ 3} Appellant filed this action for money damages and a restraining order against Margaret Bagley, warden at such facility and against other correction personnel.
{¶ 4} Appellant asserted that appellees were violating Ohio law as to the drug testing policy, that he was targeted because of legal assistance to other inmates, that other rights were violated, that a conspiracy was in place that false reports were made and abusive comments also were uttered. He also indicated that actions were based on racial discrimination in violation of Constitutional provisions.
{¶ 5} Defendants responded to the motion for TRO and preliminary injunction and moved to dismiss this action under Civ.R. 12 (B)(1) as to jurisdiction residing in the Court of Claims and on other grounds.
{¶ 6} The trial court determined that the Court of Claims did, in fact, have exclusive jurisdiction and dismissed the complaint.
{¶ 8} "THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN DISMISSING A PRO S.E. COMPLAINT, ON THE BASIS THAT THE COURT LACKED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, WHERE THE COMPLAINT PRESENTED SUBSTANTIAL VIOLATIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BY THE DEFENDANTS."
{¶ 10} Actions for monetary damages against the State or its agents may only be brought in the Court of Claims pursuant to R.C. §
{¶ 11} The Assignment of Error is rejected and the decision of the trial court is affirmed.
BY: Boggins, J., Gwin, P.J. and Wise, J. concur.
Topic: Jurisdiction