DocketNumber: No. CA2005-12-112.
Citation Numbers: 2006 Ohio 6706
Judges: <bold>BRESSLER, J</bold>.
Filed Date: 12/18/2006
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Brandon Hensley, appeals the sentencing judgment of the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas following his conviction for operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.
{¶ 2} Appellant was indicted on two third-degree felony counts of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol ("OVI"), in violation of R.C.
{¶ 3} Upon a negotiated plea agreement, appellant entered a plea of guilty to one count of OVI in violation of R.C.
{¶ 4} Assignment of Error No. 1:
{¶ 5} "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY IMPOSING A SENTENCE GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM SENTENCE REQUIRED IN VIOLATION OF OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 2929.14(B)."
{¶ 6} In his sole assignment of error, appellant argues that the trial court's imposition of a greater than minimum sentence based upon factors set forth in R.C.
{¶ 7} As acknowledged by both appellant and the state on appeal, portions of Ohio's statutory sentencing scheme have been ruled unconstitutional by the Ohio Supreme Court. See Foster at ¶ 83. Among such provisions is R.C.
{¶ 8} In this case, the trial court made express findings during sentencing that "* * * the minimum prison sentence is not appropriate because the shortest prison term possible will demean the seriousness of the offense AND will not adequately protect the public * * *." (Emphasis sic.) Because the trial court utilized R.C.
{¶ 9} Appellant's assignment of error is sustained.
{¶ 10} The judgment of the trial court is reversed as to sentencing only, and the case is remanded for resentencing.
POWELL, P.J., and YOUNG, J., concur.