DocketNumber: Case No. CA98-11-104.
Judges: <bold>POWELL, P.J.</bold>
Filed Date: 8/16/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
In 1993, appellant pled guilty to two counts of gross sexual imposition. In a January 21, 1997 letter, appellant was recommended by the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction for classification under the sexual predator statute, R.C. 2950, etseq. Before appellant's release, he was classified as a sexually-oriented offender. Appellant was released from prison in August 1998.
A sexual predator classification hearing was scheduled subsequent to appellant's release, but appellant filed a motion to dismiss. In his motion, appellant argued that a sexual predator hearing must occur before he was released from confinement. The trial court agreed, citing this court's decision in State v.Brewer (Jan. 12, 1998), Clermont App. No. CA97-03-030, unreported. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal and presents one assignment of error for our review:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR CLAIMED LACK OF JURISDICTION OVER THE APPELLEE.
While the appeal sub judice was pending, the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed our decision in Brewer. The court held "that a sexual predator hearing conducted pursuant to R.C.
Judgment affirmed.
YOUNG and VALEN, JJ., concur.