Wilhelm v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources

[Cite as Wilhelm v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 2010-Ohio-549.]
Court of Claims of Ohio
The Ohio Judicial Center
65 South Front Street, Third Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
www.cco.state.oh.us
RANDY WILHELM
Plaintiff
v.
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant
Case No. 2006-07902
Judge Joseph T. Clark
Magistrate Anderson M. Renick
JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} On December 14, 2009, the magistrate issued a decision recommending
that plaintiff’s claim of selective enforcement be dismissed, and that judgment be
rendered for defendant on plaintiff’s remaining claims.
{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to
a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not
the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by
Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed.
{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident
on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s
decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of
law contained therein. Plaintiff’s claim of selective enforcement is DISMISSED, and
judgment is rendered in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s remaining claims. Court costs
are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this
judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
Case No. 2006-07902 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY
_____________________________________
JOSEPH T. CLARK
Judge
cc:
Daniel R. Forsythe Leonard W. Yelsky
Peter E. DeMarco Norman L. Sirak
Assistant Attorneys General 75 Public Square
150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Cleveland, Ohio 44113
Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130
AMR/cmd
Filed February 1, 2010
To S.C. reporter February 16, 2010