DocketNumber: 79005
Citation Numbers: 827 P.2d 171, 563 O.B.A.J. 681, 1992 OK 30, 1992 Okla. LEXIS 35, 1992 WL 39062
Judges: Opala, Hodges, Lavender, Hargrave, Kauger
Filed Date: 3/2/1992
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
This appeal is dismissed as premature. The order of the district court, which dismisses appellant's counterclaim, but leaves the parties in court on appellee's claims against the appellant, is not a final appealable order. 12 Ohio St. 1991 Supp. § 1006. The Bar Committee Comments to 12 Ohio St. 1990 Supp. § 1006 state that if a counterclaim relates to the same transaction or occurrence as plaintiff's claims, then the district court does not have the power to enter a final appealable order, when it resolves only a part of the claims between the parties. This dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the appellant to bring a subsequent appeal in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, after a final order is entered.
OPALA, C.J., HODGES, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, HARGRAVE and KAUGER, JJ., concur.
Liberty Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, N.A. v. Rogalin , 912 P.2d 836 ( 1996 )
Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma ... , 110 P.3d 550 ( 2005 )
Simpson v. State , 63 O.B.A.J. 713 ( 1992 )
City of Lawton v. International Union of Police ... , 73 O.B.A.J. 128 ( 2002 )