Citation Numbers: 86 P. 432, 17 Okla. 37
Judges: IRWIN, J.:
Filed Date: 6/11/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Opinion of the court by
It is conceded by counsel for plaintiff in error that the questions here involved are substantially the same questions presented in the case of Winebrenner v. Forney,
In the case of Winebrenner v. Forney,
"The strip of land referred to in the President's proclamation of August 19, 1893, 'one hundred feet in width around and immediately within the outer boundaries of the entire tract of country to be opened to settlement' ran around and immediately within the outer boundaries of the body of lands opened for settlement, and not around the outer boundaries, of the entire tract specified in the cession and relinquishment of the Cherokee Indians."
In the same case, the supreme court of this territory, in the 11th Oklahoma, page 565, say:
"One who was within the Ponca Indian reservation before the hour of 12 o'clock noon (Central standard time) of September 16, 1893, and made the race from said reservation into that part of the Cherokee Outlet which was opened to settlement on that day, is not, by reason thereof, disqualified from settling upon and filing a homestead entry upon a quarter section of land within the country then declared open to settlement."
And, in the case of McCalla v. Acker,
"One who was within the Chilocco reservation before the hour of 12 o'clock, central standard time, of September 16, 1893, and made the race from such reservation into that part of the Cherokee Outlet which was opened to settlement on that day, is not, by reason thereof, disqualified from settling upon and filing a homestead entry upon a portion of said land." *Page 40
Affirmed by the supreme court of the United States, in
On the authority of these cases, the judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed, at the costs of the plaintiff in error.
Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.