Judges: W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Filed Date: 3/8/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Dear Secretary Ward,
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Opinion asking, in effect, the following questions:
1. Is property which will be, or is being, lease-purchased by a State agency, constitutionally exempt from ad valorem taxation pursuant to Article
X , §6 of the Oklahoma Constitution or 68 O.S. 1991, § 2887[68-2887 ](2)?2. Even absent the language in 68 O.S. 1991, § 2887(2) dealing with lease-purchases, would property being lease-purchased from a State-beneficiary public trust, be exempt from ad valorem taxation when the State trust retains title to the property but assigns all of its rights to receive lease payments and its remedies against the State agency lessee, to a trustee bank for the benefit of the holders of certificates of participation representing an interest in the agency lease?
¶ 1 Any analysis of ad valorem taxation begins with the proposition that all property in this State, except that which is specifically exempt by law, is subject to ad valorem taxation.68 O.S. 1991, § 2804[
¶ 2 Your first question is specifically answered by the provisions of Section 2887(2) which designates the property to be exempt from ad valorem taxation:
All property of this state, and of the counties, school districts, and municipalities of this state, including property acquired for the use of such entities pursuant to the terms of a lease-purchase agreement which provides for the passage of title or the release of security interest, if applicable, upon payment of all rental payments and an additional nominal amount[.]
68 O.S. 1991, § 2887[
¶ 3 Under the terms of 68 O.S. 1991, § 2887[
¶ 4 Your second question involves a situation where a State agency is lease-purchasing property from a State-beneficiary public trust with the trust assigning its rights to lease payments to secure its obligation to repay creditors.
¶ 5 Keeping in mind the basic rule that ad valorem taxes are the obligation of the "owner" of property, the scenario envisioned by your second question results in exemption from ad valorem tax. In State ex rel. Cartwright v. Dunbar,
¶ 6 Such a detailed analysis is not required to answer your question which envisions a situation where both lessor and lessee are State agencies. As such, each entity would be exempt from ad valorem taxation and an analysis of ownership for tax purposes would be irrelevant.
¶ 7 The relationship with the trustee bank wherein the lessor/State-beneficiary public trust assigns its rights to the bank to secure payment of bonded indebtedness is not sufficient to make the trustee bank the "owner" for purposes of ad valorem taxation. In substance all that has occurred is that the owner/lessor has assigned its rights to rentals from the lessee to secure repayment of funds borrowed to purchase the leased equipment.
¶ 8 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the AttorneyGeneral that:
1. Property which is lease-purchased by a State agency is exempt from ad valorem taxation pursuant to Article
X , §6 of the Oklahoma Constitution and 68 O.S. 1991. § 2887(2).2. Property lease-purchased from a State-beneficiary public trust by a State agency is exempt from ad valorem taxation.
W.A. DREW EDMONDSON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
DOUGLAS F. PRICE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL