Judges: W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Filed Date: 5/1/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Dear Representatives Mass
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:
1. Must county highway funds distributed pursuant to 69 O.S.1991, § 1503[
¶ 3 The courts have previously had occasion to interpret the powers of the board of county commissioners. The board of county commissioners can only act so as to bind a county while they are sitting in session as a board; individual action by a board member is not binding on a county. Austin Western Road MachineryCompany v. Board of Commissioners of Hughes County,
¶ 4 There does not appear to be any statutory authority to divide the funds for the purpose of construction and maintenance of county highways equally by all commissioners. Thus, the commissioners may only act on behalf of the entire county, not their individual districts.
¶ 5 Oklahoma statutes make it unlawful for individual county commissioners, or commissioners not acting as a board, to do business relating to only their district, versus working for the best of the entire county. The pertinent statute, states in relevant part as follows:
It is hereby declared to be contrary to law, and against public policy, for any individual county commissioner, or commissioners, when not acting as a board, to enter into any contract, or to attempt to enter into any contract, as to any of the following matters:
(a) Any purchase of equipment, machinery, supplies or materials of any kind for any county or any commissioner's district, or districts, thereof;
(b) Any contract or agreement relating to or for the leasing or rental of any equipment, machinery, supplies or materials for any county or any commissioner's district, or districts, thereof;
(c) To do or transact any business relating to such county, or any commissioner's district, or districts thereof, or to make any contract or agreement of any kind relating to the business of such county, or any commissioner's district, or districts thereof[.]
19 Ohio St. 1991, § 3[
¶ 6 The board of county commissioners in each county is required to construct and maintain as county highways those roads which best serve the most people of the county:
It shall be the duty of the board of county commissioners in each county to construct and maintain as county highways those roads which best serve the most people of the county. For this purpose the board of county commissioners is authorized to use any funds which are in the county highway fund, subject to statutory restrictions on the use of any of such funds, together with any money derived from any agreement entered into between the commission and the federal government, any county or any citizen or group of citizens who have made donations for that purpose.
69 Ohio St. 1991, § 601[
¶ 7 The statutory language demonstrates the Legislature intended that the board of county commissioners utilize the test of what will best serve the most people in decisions regarding all county highways. The duty of the board of county commissioners was interpreted in Attorney General Opinion 79-165, which stated that "a board of county commissioners has the mandatory duty to construct and maintain roads designated as primary county highways, and a discretionary duty to maintain all other roads which best serve the most people of the county."
¶ 8 The powers of the board of county commissioners regarding county highway funds is very explicit. Funds sent to the county for the purpose of highway construction and maintenance must be used by the board of county commissioners to best serve the most people of the county. The determination of which roads serve the most people of the county is a question of fact for which this office cannot provide an official opinion. 74 O.S.Supp. 1995, §18b[
¶ 10 Personal property which is conveyed to any county is "deemed the property of such county." 19 Ohio St. 1991, § 2[
¶ 11 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the AttorneyGeneral that:
1. There is no legal requirement for county highway fundsdistributed pursuant to 69 Ohio St. 1991, § 1503[is are the property of the county; i.e., it belongsto the board of county commissioners, not to individual countycommissioner districts. 19 Ohio St. 1991, § 2[
W.A. DREW EDMONDSON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
GLEN D. HAMMONDS ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
DIESEL AND SPECIAL FUELS TAXES — One half of the taxes upon diesel fuel sales collected pursuant to 68 Ohio St. 1991, §502.5[
MOTOR VEHICLE FUNDS — All fees, taxes and penalties collected or received from the Oklahoma Vehicle License and Registration Act, and the unapportioned monies from the Motor Vehicle Escrow Account are distributed pursuant to 47 Ohio St. 1991, § 1104[
Seven percent (7%) of said monies are apportioned to the counties based upon (1) the "proportion which the county road mileage of each county bears to the entire state road mileage," and (2) the proportion "the population and area of each county bears to the total population and area of the state." These funds shall be used for "the purpose of constructing and maintaining county highways." 47 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 1104[
Additionally, two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the monies are sent to the counties "for the primary purpose of matching federal funds for the construction of federal aid projects on county roads, or constructing and maintaining county or township highways and permanent bridges of such counties." 47 O.S.Supp.1995, § 1104[