Noll v. State

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Chas. Noll, was convicted at the January, 1913, term of the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge of conducting games of craps and roulette. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error in this cause, and advises the court in his judgment the conviction should be reversed. In part the confession is as follows:

“This information charges the defendant with having on the Kith day of January, 1913, unlawfully opened, and with having unlawfully conducted as owner, a game of craps played with dice for money and a game of roulette played with table, wheel, and ball for money. We have carefully examined the transcript of the testimony of the witnesses McColghan and Durham, who were the sole witnesses giving testimony in this case, and have failed to find where either of them have testified directly to any facts or circumstances that prove that this defendant on the day charged, or on any other day, opened up a game of craps that was played for-money; nor does the evidence prove that any game, either roul.ette or craps, was played by anybody at any time in his place of business for money, checks, or other representatives of value. In our opinion, this proof was absolutely necessary to sustain a conviction on this information.”

The confession of error is well taken, and is sustained. If this conviction had been based on section '2503, Rev. Laws 3910, it could possibly be upheld; but, instead of being based on section 2503, it is based on section .2498, Rev. Laws 1910, and under the latter section the conviction as a matter of law is contrary to the evidence.

The judgment is therefore reversed.