DocketNumber: No. A-8125.
Citation Numbers: 9 P.2d 963, 53 Okla. Crim. 214
Judges: EDWARDS, J.
Filed Date: 1/9/1932
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of *Page 215 Pontotoc county of seduction and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 60 days and a fine of $1,000.
The record discloses that at the time charged defendant, who was of the age of 23 years, seduced under promise of marriage one Zenobia Jervis, of the age of 20 years. The prosecutrix testified to the acts of intercourse under promise of marriage. The only corroboration of her testimony is that she kept company with defendant and that she told her mother and made some quilts preparatory to getting married. This testimony was weakened somewhat on cross-examination. Defendant admits he had intercourse with prosecutrix, but denies he ever made any promise of marriage. Several male witnesses testified that at about the time charged they had intercourse with prosecutrix. This testimony was denied by prosecutrix. The corroboration required by section 2703, Comp. Stat. 1921, is not strong, but it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to sustain the judgment. Hill v. State,
DAVENPORT, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.