Citation Numbers: 64 Or. 412, 129 P. 1043
Judges: McBride
Filed Date: 2/18/1913
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/23/2022
Opinion by
In October, 1898, one J. Fay Clark executed a deed to the Clackamas Abstract & Trust Company, purporting to convey a quarter section of land in Tillamook County to the grantee. John F. Clark, who was not in any way related to J. Fay Clark, the grantor, was the president, manager, and principal stockholder in the company, and testifies that the grantor, being in failing health, offered to convey the land to him in recognition of certain friendly services rendered him, and that among other reasons he assigned for this course was the fact that his wife and children in the east were indifferent to him, and that he did not want them to have the property in case of his death. John F. Clark prepared a deed to the land, naming the abstract company as grantee, but, as he says, intending that it should be held for him. He was a notary public, and, as such, took the acknowledgment and also signed as one of the witnesses. The deed was not recorded. J. Fay Clark died in Oregon City in 1902. Neither he nor John F. Clark gave any attention to the land or paid the taxes upon it from 1896 until its purchase by defendant Latourette. In the fall of 1907, Latourette, having had his attention called to this land by an inquiry from
The plaintiffs, who are the widow and children of J. Fay Clark, brought this suit to quiet title to the land, and Latourette sets up his title through the conveyance mentioned. The plaintiffs by way of reply deny the execution of the conveyance from J. Fay Clark to the abstract company. They further allege that, if J. Fay Clark ever executed a conveyance to the abstract company, it was executed with the name of the grantee left blank, so as to enable John F. Clark, as the agent of J. Fay Clark, to insert the name of any purchaser he might find for the land, that he found no purchaser, and that his authority to insert a name ceased upon the death of J. Fay Clark, which occurred October 4, 1902.
“All deeds or other instruments affecting or purporting to affect real property heretofore executed, in this State, or in any State or Territory of the United States, or in any foreign country, which shall have been signed by the grantor, shall be effective according to the terms of such instrument without sealing or other execution, acknowledgment of witnesses thereto whatever, and all such instruments which shall have been acknowledged or attempted in good faith to be acknowledged before an-, officer having a seal, whether within or without the State of Oregon, or an officer without a seal, whose authority to take acknowledgments within the State where the acknowledgment was taken or attempted to be taken shall be proved by certificate of the clerk of a court of record in such State, shall be entitled to record, and such instruments so executed shall be received in evidence in all courts in this State and be evidence of the titles of the lands therein described against the grantors, their heirs and assigns. When such deed or other instruments so executed are recorded in the records of deeds in the proper county of this State, the record thereof duly certified by the county clerk of such county shall be evidence in all courts and have the same effect as the original thereof.”
We are of the opinion that this section was intended to render valid for all purposes the class of instruments mentioned therein, and that all such deeds after the passage of said act, if not theretofore recorded were entitled to record, and that certified copies of such record are entitled to be received in evidence upon the same footing as conveyances regularly witnessed and acknowledged. This being the case, there was no error committed in receiving the certified copy of the deed in evidence.
The decree is affirmed. Affirmed.