DocketNumber: SC S48622
Citation Numbers: 332 Or. 519, 32 P.3d 889
Judges: Carson, Durham, Gillette, Leeson, Muniz, Riggs
Filed Date: 9/17/2001
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/23/2022
The modified ballot title for Initiative Petition 54 (2002) states:
“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: ALLOWS REGISTERED VOTERS TO SIGN INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM, AND RECALL PETITIONS BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF ‘SIGNATURE’
“RESULT OF YES’ VOTE: Yes’ vote allows registered voters to sign initiative, referendum, and recall petitions by electronic transmission of‘signature’; continues to allow handwritten signatures.
“RESULT OF ‘NO’ VOTE: ‘No’ vote rejects proposal permitting registered voters to sign initiative, referendum, and recall petitions by electronic transmission of ‘signature’; retains current law allowing handwritten signatures.
“SUMMARY: Amends Constitution. Current law allows handwritten signatures on initiative, referendum, and recall petitions, but does not provide for ‘signing1 such petitions by electronic transmission. Measure allows voters to ‘sign’ petitions by electronic transmission. Electronic transmission means computer transmission, through the internet or other computer network. ‘Electronic signature’ must include voter’s name and residential address, in substantial conformity with voter registration information. Until government provides each voter a unique identifier, voter also must provide contact information, such as e-mail address, telephone number, which shall not become public*521 record. Election officials must either validate or prove signatures invalid using identifying information provided by petition signer. Legislature shall review electronic-petitioning process, and create new provisions to standardize, but not hinder, process. Other provisions.”
The modified ballot title is certified. The appellate judgment shall issue in accordance with ORS 250.085(9).