DocketNumber: D84-1296; CA A41627
Citation Numbers: 89 Or. App. 172, 747 P.2d 383
Judges: Rossman, Young
Filed Date: 12/30/1987
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/24/2022
Husband appeals from a judgment holding him in contempt for his wilful failure to pay child support. We reverse, because the trial court refused to hear his evidence.
Husband appeared pro se at the contempt hearing.
“THE COURT: Mr. Brown [husband], this is your opportunity to summarize any of the issues that—
“[Husband]: May I call a witness please.
“THE COURT: No. It’s already past time to call witnesses.
“[Husband]: I wasn’t aware of that — .”
Husband then argued his case without having an opportunity to present any evidence.
It was reversible error to deny husband the right to call witnesses. ORS 33.090; State v. Meyer, 31 Or App 775, 780, 571 P2d 550 (1977); see State ex rel Hathaway v. Hart, 70 Or App 541, 545, 690 P2d 514 (1984), aff’d 300 Or 231 (1985).
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Husband was advised by the trial court of his right to counsel. ORS 33.095.