In re the Marriage of Kasper

PER CURIAM

In this appeal from a dissolution judgment, husband contends that the trial court erred in its valuation of certain real property. Wife cross-appeals the court’s denial of her motion for an accounting and to surcharge husband for personal use of marital assets. Both appeals have merits. However, on de novo review, we conclude, after considering those merits, that the property distribution is equitable.

Affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal. No costs to either party.