DocketNumber: LCDC 90-CERT-659; CA A66688
Citation Numbers: 108 Or. App. 307, 814 P.2d 561
Judges: Buttler, Muniz, Rossman
Filed Date: 7/31/1991
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/24/2022
Petitioner seeks review of LCDC’s order certifying the State Agency Coordination Program of the Department of Fish and Wildlife (department). ORS 197.180; OAR 660, Divisions 30 and 31.
Petitioner maintains that the department was required to include the guide, because it is a “rule” or “program” that is “[rjeasonably expected to have significant effects on * * * [pjresent or future land uses identified in acknowledged comprehensive plans.” OAR 660-30-005(2)(a)(B)(ii). As best we are able to discern from petitioner’s diffuse argument, its principal point seems to be that, by advising department personnel of the department’s viewpoints and about how to participate in local land use proceedings, the guide “substantially affects present and future land uses, because [it] substantially affects the legislative and quasi-judicial land use actions of local governments.”
That argument presupposes that local decisions are actually made by the department personnel who appear before or otherwise assist the decisionmakers to explain or advocate the department’s viewpoint. There is no basis for that presupposition. Petitioner urges us to honor substance over form. However, its argument consists of shadow rather than either form or substance.
Affirmed.
ORS 197.180 requires state agencies to comply with land use requirements in carrying “out their planning duties, powers and responsibilities.” ORS 197.180(2) through (9) create a procedure for LCDC’s certification that state agency “rules and programs are sufficient to assure compliance with the goals and compatibility with acknowledged city and county plans and land use regulations * * The cited rules, adopted pursuant to ORS 197.180(9), implement the statutory requirements and procedures.