DocketNumber: 93P-20974; CA A84395
Citation Numbers: 132 Or. App. 440, 888 P.2d 1077, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 99
Judges: Edmonds, Landau, Warren
Filed Date: 1/25/1995
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
Mother, who has custody of their child after dissolution of her marriage to father, appeals from a judgment granting grandparent visitation rights to the paternal grandfather. ORS 109.121. Mother argues that the trial court erred in awarding visitation rights. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse.
After mother filed the petition for dissolution, grandfather, who had regularly visited the child, brought this action for grandparent visitation rights. Those rights are purely statutory. ORS 109.121 provides, in pertinent part, that a grandparent may seek a court order establishing visitation rights if “the custodian of the child has denied the grandparent reasonable opportunity to visit the child.”
There is evidence that, after mother and father separated, she occasionally denied grandfather the opportunity to visit the child.
Judgment allowing grandparent visitation reversed; otherwise affirmed.
ORS 109.121 also requires that “the grandparent has established or has attempted to establish ongoing personal contact with the child.” The parties agree that grandfather has an ongoing personal relationship with child.
The only evidence in the record about why mother declined to let grandfather visit child is that, on one of those occasions, child was ill.
Grandfather refers to other evidence in the record that purportedly shows why mother unreasonably denied him visitation rights. That evidence refers to reasons why, while mother and father were still living together, they sometimes denied grandfather’s attempts to visit child.