State v. P. F.

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant appeals a judgment of continued involuntary commitment. ORS 426.307(6). He contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others. ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support recommitment. We agree and accept the state’s concession; accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.