DocketNumber: 75-1044, CA 5195
Citation Numbers: 550 P.2d 758, 25 Or. App. 675
Judges: Schwab, Fort, Lee
Filed Date: 6/14/1976
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
H. David Price, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
James A. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and LEE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a postconviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or. App. 596, 465 P.2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.
Affirmed.
State v. Henley , 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1891 ( 1977 )
State v. Sweet , 30 Or. App. 45 ( 1977 )
State v. Chase , 624 P.2d 1100 ( 1981 )
State v. Bateman , 48 Or. App. 357 ( 1980 )
Matthew Sexton v. Mike Cozner ( 2012 )
State v. Neighbors , 55 Or. App. 882 ( 1982 )