DocketNumber: TC 4389.
Judges: CARL N. BYERS, Judge.
Filed Date: 8/13/1999
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
The facts are undisputed. On February 10, 1999, a magistrate issued a written decision in Brown v. Jackson County Assessor, OTC-MD 982848D. On February 22, 1999, a motion for reconsideration was filed and was denied by order dated March 4, 1999. On April 12, 1999, a Complaint was filed in the Regular Division entitled Jackson County Assessor v. Sandra Brown. However, this Complaint was signed by an employee of the assessor's office who is neither an attorney nor an appropriate party. On April 26, 1999, the county filed an Amended Complaint signed by county counsel.
Taxpayer has moved to strike the first Complaint on the ground that it is a nullity because it was not signed by an attorney who is a member of the Oregon State Bar. The county acknowledges that the person who signed the Complaint was not an attorney and makes no claim for any validity of the Complaint.
Taxpayer moves to dismiss the Amended Complaint on the ground that it was not timely filed.
ORS
"Any party dissatisfied with a written decision of a magistrate may appeal the decision to the judge of the tax court by filing a complaint in the regular division of the tax court within 60 days after the date of mailing of the decision.
"* * * * *
"(7) If no appeal is taken to the tax court judge within 60 days, the decision of the magistrate shall become final."
Taxpayer's motion to dismiss assumes that a motion for reconsideration or a motion for new trial does not extend the time for appealing a magistrate's written decision. Taxpayer's assumption is correct.
As used in ORS
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike Complaint and Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint are granted.
Dated this 13th day of August, 1999.
_________________________________ CARL N. BYERS Judge