DocketNumber: TC-MD 090028D.
Judges: JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING, Magistrate.
Filed Date: 6/12/2009
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
Defendant issued a Notice of Deficiency, dated September 3, 2008, stating that Plaintiff "received wages from Time Frame, Inc." in the amount of $45,340. (Ptf s Ex A at 3.) Plaintiff listed Time Frame Inc. as his employer on Form 4852, "Substitute for Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, or Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc." (Ptf s Ex D at 5.) In its Notice of Deficiency, Defendant stated that Plaintiffs failure to report wages as taxable income for multiple years lead it to conclude that Plaintiffs 2007 filed return was a
"fraudulent return under ORS
314.400 . ORS314.400 (3)(b) states that a penalty equal to 100% of any deficiency determined by the department shall be assessed if a report or return was falsely prepared and filed with intent to evade tax. The Department has determined there is a substantial understatement of taxable income for this tax year. Therefore, there shall be added to the amount of tax required to be shown on the return a penalty equal to 20% of the amount of any underpayment of tax attributable to the understatement of taxable income. (ORS314.402 )."
(Ptf s Ex A at 3.) In addition, Defendant assessed a $250 penalty because it concluded that Plaintiff took "a ``frivolous position' in respect to preparing [his] return." (Ptf s Ex A at 4.) Defendant's Notice of Deficiency Assessment was issued on October 10, 2008. (Ptfs Ex C.)
In its Answer, Defendant requested that the court "uphold the department's assessment." (Def s Answer at 2.) In addition, Defendant requested that "the court * * * award damages for a frivolous or groundless appeal under ORS
Plaintiff states "[u]nder penalties of perjury" that his employer was Time Frame Inc. (Ptf's Ex D at 5.) Plaintiff did not submit a copy of a W-2 from Time Frame Inc. On his state income tax return forms, Plaintiff reported no wages or W-2 income. Defendant wrote that Plaintiff "earned wages from Time Frame, Inc. The wages Mr. Negrete received are taxable to Oregon." (Def's Ans at 1.) Defendant wrote that Plaintiff failed to report wages he earned on prior year Oregon income tax returns including tax years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. (Id.)
"In all proceedings before the judge or a magistrate of the tax court and upon appeal therefrom, a preponderance of the evidence shall suffice to sustain the burden of proof. The burden of proof shall fall upon theparty seeking affirmative relief." ORS
Plaintiff reaches an erroneous conclusion that "[t]here is no legal mechanism by which Plaintiff can be coerced by the Defendant, who is presumed to know the law, into reporting one amount of adjusted gross income on a federal return and a different amount on a state return." (Ptf's Mot for Summ J at 2.) ORS
"[w]ith respect to any tax return filed under ORS chapter
314 ,316 ,317 or318 , deficiencies shall include but not be limited to the assertion of additional tax arising from:"(a) The failure to report properly items or amounts of income subject to or which are the measure of the tax."
Plaintiff failed to report an item of income and Defendant assessed a deficiency in accordance with ORS
Defendant asked the court to award damages because Plaintiff filed a frivolous appeal. The Oregon Supreme Court recently concluded that "the legislature clearly intended an award of "damages' under ORS
Because Defendant failed to offer evidence of its "actual losses, costs or expenses," the court denies its request for damages under ORS
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiffs appeal is denied; and
IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Defendant's request for damages is denied.
Dated this ___ day of June 2009.
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner onJune 12, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on June 12,2009.
Negrete v. Dept. of Rev. , 2006 Ore. Tax LEXIS 162 ( 2006 )
Combs v. Department of Revenue , 15 Or. Tax 60 ( 1999 )
Clark v. Department of Revenue , 2000 Ore. Tax LEXIS 19 ( 2000 )
Feves v. Department of Revenue , 4 Or. Tax 302 ( 1971 )
Clark v. Department of Revenue , 332 Or. 236 ( 2001 )
Department of Revenue v. Croslin , 345 Or. 620 ( 2009 )