Judges: Rogers
Filed Date: 3/14/1848
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below. If the fact was, that the premises were occupied under an existing lease, commencing before the rendition of the judgment, it should have been so specially returned, for the obvious reason, that the plaintiff is entitled to receive and compel payment of the arrearages of rent, in liquidation of the debt.
Judgment affirmed.