Citation Numbers: 10 Pa. 348, 1849 Pa. LEXIS 224
Judges: Rosees
Filed Date: 5/21/1849
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
After a careful examination of the authorities cited, we concur in the opinion that this is a covenant to stand seised to uses. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons given by Judge Hayes. We perceive nothing in the contract, as contended, in conflict with the law or policy of this state, either as it affects the collateral inheritance tax, or the dower of any future wife.
Judgment affirmed.