DocketNumber： Appeal, No. 201
Citation Numbers： 149 Pa. 239, 24 A. 339, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1104
Judges： Hey, Ick, McCollum, Paxson, Stebbett, Williams
Filed Date： 5/23/1892
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/13/2024
This was a question of subrogation. The printed evidence occupies over 200 pages, and there are 23 specifications of error. A careful and somwhat painful examination of the case fails to show that the discretion of the court below was not properly exercised.
The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.