DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 67
Citation Numbers: 190 Pa. 341, 42 A. 1105, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1027
Judges: Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mitchell, Stjsrrett
Filed Date: 3/13/1899
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
We are satisfied, from our examination of the evidence in this case, that it is wholly insufficient to sustain the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant lot into a defense. The learned court was therefore clearly right in discharging the rule.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.