DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 339
Citation Numbers: 214 Pa. 185, 63 A. 457, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 623
Judges: Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter, Stewart
Filed Date: 2/26/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
This case, as tbe learned judge remarked at the trial, was presented to the jury in a very unsatisfactory and fragmentary shape and the condition was not improved by the shifting and not altogether consistent forms in which the question was reserved on which judgment was entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto. The judges of this court who heard the argument being equally divided, the judgment is affirmed.