DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 379
Citation Numbers: 249 Pa. 223, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705, 94 A. 1058
Judges: Brown, Elkin, Mestbezat, Stewart
Filed Date: 4/19/1915
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
The nonsuit in this case was entered because it was manifest from the testimony that the plaintiff continued to work at a place which he knew to be dangerous, and voluntarily took the chance of being injured. He showed nothing making the defendants liable for the consequences of his. rashness in continuing at the dangerpus post. The judgment is¿ therefore, affirmed.