DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 230
Judges: Brown, Moschzisker, Potter, Stewart, Walling
Filed Date: 6/30/1917
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
The provision in the will of the testatrix for Mary E. McManemy, now Mary E. Mulliken, was for income only, and, with the codicil’s revocation of that provision* there was, as the court below correctly held, an intestacy as to such income, without affecting the testamentary disposition of the corpus or principal from which it accrued : Reiehard’s App., 116 Pa. 232.
Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.