DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 42
Judges: Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Musmanno, Roberts
Filed Date: 5/11/1964
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Concurring Opinion by
I heartily concur in everything said in the excellent majority opinion and would add only that I am happy to note that this Court has decided not to be bound by what printers on arbitrary forms designate to be the end of the will, in accordance with the Wills Act. When one has expressed all he intends to say, whether it be in writing or in speech, his last words constitute the end of his expression, regardless of the extraneous interposition of printed matter which the speaker or writer does not accept. End means End and no kind of interpretation can change the significance of finality-