DocketNumber： Appeal, No. 301
Citation Numbers： 416 Pa. 559, 207 A.2d 590, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 719
Judges： Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Musmanno, Roberts
Filed Date： 3/16/1965
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/13/2024
Opinion
An examination of the record in this appeal indicates that the amount in controversy is such that this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. As in Kungsgaten, Inc. v. Phila., 416 Pa. 352, 206 A. 2d 8 (1965), this appeal under our Rule 68-1/2, was im
The matter is remitted to the Superior Court.