DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 247
Judges: Brien, Eagen, Jones, Mandertno, Nix, Pomeeoy, Pomeroy, Roberts
Filed Date: 10/16/1974
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
Dissenting Opinion by
I respectfully dissent from the reversal of the judgment of sentence because it is based upon a retrospective application of the exclusionary rule first announced in Commonwealth v. Futch, 447 Pa. 389, 290 A.2d 417 (1972). See the dissenting opinion of this writer in Commonwealth v. Johnson, 458 Pa. 425, 327 A.2d 618 (1974) and the opinions therein cited.