Citation Numbers: 1 Yeates 305
Filed Date: 10/15/1793
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Perhaps the widow would be a competent witness in a common case. But the true objection against her testimony appears to us to be the subject matter of it. On principles of general convenience, it would be highly dangerous to admit evidence of this kind to impeach the titles of vendees under sheriff’s sales. If declarations of the debtor, that he had sold the lands to another, could be brought forward in this way to overreach a judgment against him, no one would ever purchase at a sheriff’s sale, and every cre'ditor would be at the justice, if not-mercy of his debtor. If there has been a bona fide sale by Martin Miller previous to the judgment, let it be shewn by the written agreement or conveyance. Should they have been lost, prove them by copies, or give their contents to the jury by parol evidence. No inconveniences can result from this better mode of proof; but it is of the utmost importance to the community, that in disputes like the present,, which unfortunately have become too frequent, that the rules of law should be rigidly adhered to; and therefore we feel ourselves constrained to overrule the deposition.'
The lands in question having been bought at a very inadequate price 61. 15s., (owing to an idea which prevailed at the