Filed Date: 11/9/1885
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The court correctly refused the subrogation asked for. The appellees were under no obligation to him to pay the tax on the whisky. That was a matter between them and Moss only. The appellant had no lien on the whisky nor any property in it.
He cannot acquire it by subrogation.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.