DocketNumber: No. 13, M. D.
Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Pee, Sterrett, Unkey
Filed Date: 10/3/1887
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
The plaintiff in error, defendant- below, admits that the work-sued for was done under a contract by which its price was definitely fixed. It was, therefore, to no purpose to prove for what price others would have done the work; hence, the offer-covered by the assignment of error was properly refused.
Judgment affirmed.