DocketNumber： Appeal, No. 9
Judges： Frazer, Sadler, Schaffer, Simpson, Walling
Filed Date： 3/7/1921
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/13/2024
The testimony produced in this case was competent and clearly supports the conclusion reached by the Workmen’s Compensation Board that an award should be made in favor of the plaintiff.
The award is affirmed and the appeal dismissed on the opinion of the learned court below.
Boscola v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co. ( 1927 )
Johnson v. Baldwin Locomotive Works ( 1929 )
Ewing v. Alan Wood Steel Co. ( 1939 )
Andrisin v. Temple Coal Co. ( 1931 )
McAdams v. Pearson and Ludascher ( 1927 )
Barton v. Federal Enameling & Stamping Co. ( 1936 )
Young v. Hamilton Watch Co. ( 1945 )
Grazer v. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Co. ( 1947 )