DocketNumber： Appeal, No. 9
Citation Numbers： 270 Pa. 12
Judges： Frazer, Sadler, Schaffer, Simpson, Walling
Filed Date： 3/7/1921
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 2/17/2022
The testimony produced in this case was competent and clearly supports the conclusion reached by the Workmen’s Compensation Board that an award should be made in favor of the plaintiff.
The award is affirmed and the appeal dismissed on the opinion of the learned court below.
Robinson v. Y.W.C.A. , 215 Pa. Super. 19 ( 1969 )
McAdams v. Pearson and Ludascher , 92 Pa. Super. 152 ( 1927 )
Barton v. Federal E. S. Co. , 122 Pa. Super. 587 ( 1936 )
Johnson v. Baldwin Loco. Wks. , 98 Pa. Super. 28 ( 1929 )
Grazer v. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft , 161 Pa. Super. 434 ( 1947 )
Boscola v. Penna. Coal Coke Co. , 90 Pa. Super. 456 ( 1927 )
Andrisin v. Temple Coal Co. , 101 Pa. Super. 235 ( 1931 )
Hopwood v. Pittsburgh , 152 Pa. Super. 398 ( 1943 )
Ewing v. Alan Wood Steel Co. , 138 Pa. Super. 519 ( 1939 )