DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 6
Citation Numbers: 155 Pa. 62, 25 A. 826, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1187
Judges: Dean, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Filed Date: 1/16/1893
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
We think this case is ruled by Bradstreet v. Everson, 72 Pa. 124, and by Morgan v. Tener, 83 Pa. 305. The defendants, having undertaken the collection of plaintiffs’ claims, are responsible for the neglect of the attorney employed by them by which the claims were lost. The question of defendants’ negligence was fairly submitted to the jury, and their verdict is conclusive upon the question of fact. ¡,
Judgment affirmed.