DocketNumber： Appeal, No. 35
Citation Numbers： 261 Pa. 199, 104 A. 582, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 714
Judges： Brown, Frazer, Moschzisker, Potter, Walling
Filed Date： 4/22/1918
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/13/2024
The correct conclusion of the learned court below was that it clearly appears from plaintiff’s statement of his cause of action that the injuries he sustained were due to his carelessness or negligence, and the judgment, which was properly entered under the Act of May 14,1915, P. L. 488, is affirmed.
Conboy v. Osage Tribe No. 113 , 288 Pa. 193 ( 1926 )
Hoffner Et Ux. v. Bergdoll , 309 Pa. 558 ( 1932 )
Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp. , 332 Pa. 65 ( 1938 )
Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. , 322 Pa. 449 ( 1935 )
Barth Et Vir v. Klinck , 360 Pa. 616 ( 1948 )
Modony v. Megdal , 318 Pa. 273 ( 1935 )
Bartek v. Grossman , 356 Pa. 522 ( 1947 )
Luthier v. Kline , 145 Pa. Super. 188 ( 1941 )
Smalley v. First National Bank , 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 105 ( 1925 )