DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 21
Judges: Beown, Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mesteezat, Mitchell, Pottee
Filed Date: 11/8/1901
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The testimony required a submission of the case to the jury. It tended to show that the ridge of ice had existed on the sidewalk for sufficient time to imply notice to the city, even if there was not notice in fact. The plaintiff was entitled to traverse the sidewalk, using proper care in so doing, and whether he had used such care was also for the jury. We therefore dismiss the specifications of error.
Judgment affirmed.