Citation Numbers: 92 A.3d 807
Filed Date: 5/28/2014
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/26/2024
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is: Did the Superior Court err in determining that the trial court could unilaterally shorten the terms of a 3 year old bargained for plea agreement in order for [Respondent] to avoid the collateral consequences of SORNA, ignoring established precedent and denying the Commonwealth the benefit of its plea agreement?