Citation Numbers: 162 A. 286, 308 Pa. 297
Judges: PER CURIAM, June 30, 1932:
Filed Date: 5/9/1932
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Argued May 9, 1932. This is an action of assumpsit brought to recover an amount alleged to be due the estate of plaintiff's decedent from the estate of Frank C. Bosler, deceased, Hannah Elizabeth Bosler, executrix of the latter estate and *Page 298 the present owner of real estate formerly belonging to her decedent, being joined as individual defendant.
The record shows that both parties experienced difficulty in presenting their claims and answers with conciseness, brevity and accuracy, and that the court below displayed great patience with their failure to do so, refusing, since both were at fault, to allow advantages to one over the other because of technical defects. We will not discuss the facts presented in the confused record. Obviously, the case is not "clear and free from doubt" and the court below correctly refused to give judgment on the pleadings: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy,
The appeal is dismissed.
Harrisburg Sch. Dist. v. Eureka Cas. Co. , 310 Pa. 280 ( 1933 )
Peabody v. Carr , 316 Pa. 413 ( 1934 )
Pyles, Exrx. v. Bosler, Exrx. , 313 Pa. 548 ( 1934 )
Coral Gables, Inc. v. MacBroom , 311 Pa. 183 ( 1933 )
Arch v. Slovene Nat. Bene. Society , 156 Pa. Super. 64 ( 1944 )
Kramer v. Mutual L. Ins. Co. of N.Y. , 116 Pa. Super. 572 ( 1934 )