Citation Numbers: 59 A.2d 877, 359 Pa. 540
Judges: PER CURIAM, July 6, 1948:
Filed Date: 5/26/1948
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
The decree of the court below is affirmed on the authority ofCommonwealth v. Katz,
"Our uniform rule is that, on an appeal from a decree which refuses, grants or continues a preliminary injunction, we will look only to see if there were any apparently reasonable grounds for the action of the court below, and we will not further consider the merits of the case or pass upon the reasons for or against such action, unless it is plain that no such grounds existed or that the rules of law relied on are palpably wrong or clearly inapplicable (Paxson's App.,
The costs are to be paid by the appellants. *Page 542
Paxson's Appeal , 106 Pa. 429 ( 1884 )
Com. v. Katz , 281 Pa. 287 ( 1924 )
Borough of Sunbury v. Sunbury & Susquehanna Railway Co. , 241 Pa. 357 ( 1913 )
Summit Township v. Fennell , 392 Pa. 313 ( 1958 )
Keystone Guild, Inc. v. Pappas , 399 Pa. 46 ( 1960 )
Lindenfelser v. Lindenfelser , 385 Pa. 342 ( 1956 )
Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co. , 386 Pa. 231 ( 1956 )
Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n , 395 Pa. 257 ( 1959 )