Citation Numbers: 191 A. 611, 326 Pa. 141, 1937 Pa. LEXIS 437
Judges: OPINION BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE KEPHART, April 19, 1937:
Filed Date: 3/22/1937
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017
Argued March 22, 1937. The School District of the Township of Conemaugh, appellant, not having a senior high school, sent its pupils to the high school maintained by the appellee school district, thereby becoming indebted to the latter for their tuition. In such cases the cost of tuition which the district maintaining the school may charge is regulated by the Act of May 1, 1925, P. L. 435, which includes the following items and no others:
"(1) Instruction, including the salaries of members of the teaching and supervisory staff, and attendance of teachers at institutes; *Page 143
"(2) Textbooks and school supplies, and
"(3) Fuel, light, water and janitor service, and shall also include ten per centum (10%) of the total cost of said items."
From the gross sum is deducted the appropriation received from the Commonwealth.
Appellee brought suit to recover the amount of the unpaid balance of such tuition for the school year 1933-34.
Appellant depended on the financial reports filed by appellee with the Department of Public Instruction. Appellee explained the discrepancy between those reports and the statement on which it based its claim as being due to the fact that the former were calculated on the cost and attendance of six grades, while the amount owing for tuition is computed as the basis of a four year course.
The court below heard the case without a jury. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the judge's findings for appellee that the items in the account were correct, being calculated upon a proper four year high school course; and they will not be disturbed: Perkins v. Halpren,
Appellant objects to the allowance of the salary of clerks and the cost of "textbooks" which were admitted to be reference and supplementary books kept in the library of appellee's high school in connection with the study of English and other subjects. Such costs, it is argued, are not included within those enumerated in the act. While the provisions of the School Code dealing with tuition must be strictly construed (Norristown Borough School District v. Upper MerionTownship School District,
"Textbooks" are not restricted to books studied by the pupils in the schoolroom but include as well books which must be studied to complete textbook work. The books in question here were selected volumes, and the list submitted shows they were supplementary to the textbooks. They were in effect that class of books. The need for and propriety of the purchase of such supplementary and reference books is recognized elsewhere in the Act,* and they are properly treated as "textbooks" in computing the cost of tuition.
Appellant asserted a counterclaim for overpayments made in preceding years, but according to appellee's secretary the costs imposed in the high school grades in the contested years were undercharges rather than overpayments. The trial judge found defendant had not proven its counterclaim. This finding has sufficient basis in the record, and this court will not disturb it.
Judgment affirmed.
Brown, Early & Co. v. Susquehanna Boom Co. , 109 Pa. 57 ( 1885 )
Perkins ex rel. Bank of Commerce v. Halpren , 257 Pa. 402 ( 1917 )
Norristown Borough School District v. Upper Merion Township ... , 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 369 ( 1912 )
Commonwealth v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. , 151 Pa. 265 ( 1892 )