Citation Numbers: 172 A. 651, 315 Pa. 353
Judges: OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE DREW, May 21, 1934:
Filed Date: 4/23/1934
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Argued April 23, 1934. This action of trespass was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him when he was struck by an automobile owned by defendant and operated by her servant. At the close of plaintiff's case the trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit, which the court in banc subsequently refused to take off. Plaintiff died after taking this appeal, and his executor was substituted as appellant.
Plaintiff testified that on the day of the accident he was employed as janitor at a public school situated at the northeast corner of Swatara Street and Broad Street in the Borough of Tamaqua, Schuylkill County. Swatara Street runs north and south and Broad Street runs east and west. As part of his duties, plaintiff acted as a traffic officer to protect the children crossing at this intersection during the opening and closing hours of school. Shortly after 3:30 p. m. on the day in question, while it was raining, he was standing in the center of this intersection, in the performance of his duties as traffic officer. He was wearing a policeman's cap and badge and had a policeman's whistle. He was facing east along Broad Street, glancing occasionally over his left shoulder northwardly along Swatara Street. While he did not remain perfectly still, he kept within a step or two of the center of the intersection. When he had been there for about twenty minutes, he was struck from behind by defendant's automobile, which, it was testified by the driver and an eyewitness, proceeded southwardly along Swatara Street and made a left turn into Broad Street. At the time he was struck he was looking to the east down Broad Street, and did not see the approaching car. The driver stated that he came to a full stop before entering the intersection, that the portion of the windshield *Page 355 covered by the wiper was clear, and that he could see the buildings on the other side of the intersection, but said that he did not see the plaintiff until after the impact. He gave no reason or excuse for not having seen him. Plaintiff was plainly visible to the driver for at least 150 feet before he struck him. Another witness, called by plaintiff, said that she saw the accident from a window of the school building.
It is true, as defendant contends, that the mere fact that a pedestrian is struck by an automobile in a public street is not sufficient to prove negligence on the part of the driver: Wiser v. Parkway Baking Co.,
Judgment reversed with a procedendo.
Roberts, Admr. v. Freihofer B. Co. , 283 Pa. 573 ( 1925 )
Peters v. Schroeder , 290 Pa. 217 ( 1927 )
Robb v. Quaker City Cab Co. , 283 Pa. 454 ( 1925 )
Riefer v. Niehl Transportation Co. , 309 Pa. 251 ( 1932 )
Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co. , 314 Pa. 569 ( 1934 )
Wiser v. Parkway Baking Co. , 289 Pa. 565 ( 1927 )
Justice v. Weymann , 306 Pa. 88 ( 1931 )
Craven v. Pittsburgh Railways Co. , 243 Pa. 619 ( 1914 )
Cecola v. 44 Cigar Co. , 253 Pa. 623 ( 1916 )
Petrie v. E. A. Myers Co. , 269 Pa. 134 ( 1920 )
Goodsell v. Brighenti , 128 Conn. 581 ( 1942 )
Radtke v. Loud , 98 So. 2d 891 ( 1957 )
Bills, Admrx. v. Zitterbart , 363 Pa. 207 ( 1949 )
Smith v. Shatz , 331 Pa. 453 ( 1938 )
Copertino v. Chrobak , 346 Pa. 49 ( 1942 )
Valente v. Lindner , 340 Pa. 508 ( 1940 )
Knowles v. Stargel , 261 Wis. 106 ( 1952 )
Logan, to Use v. Bethlehem City , 324 Pa. 7 ( 1936 )
Birnesser v. McGath , 356 Pa. 375 ( 1947 )
Pfendler v. Speer , 323 Pa. 443 ( 1936 )
Brooks v. Morgan , 331 Pa. 235 ( 1938 )
Hulmes v. Keel , 335 Pa. 117 ( 1939 )
Martin v. Marateck , 345 Pa. 103 ( 1942 )