DocketNumber: 104 E.D. Appeal Docket 1987
Judges: Zappala, Cappy, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Papadakos
Filed Date: 5/18/1992
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
dissenting.
Once again, I write to express my view that although it may be proper for an appellate court to dismiss or quash an appeal when the appellant is a fugitive, Pa.R.A.P. 1972(6)
That said, I find it thoroughly incongruous that the Court here has opted not to dismiss or quash the appeal, but to limit the issues and decide them on the merits. As the appellant is beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, I would simply quash the appeal.
. The fact that Rule 1972(6) permits the court not only to quash an appeal because the appellant is a fugitive, but also "to continue