DocketNumber: Appeal 1090 MAL 2004
Citation Numbers: 871 A.2d 185, 582 Pa. 356
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 3/15/2005
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/26/2023
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:
Whether 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?
Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) be subjected to individual counts for each piece of child pornography possessed?
If the General Assembly so intended, is it constitutional to impose separate punishments for each conviction?