DocketNumber： Appeal 68 W.D. Appeal Docket 1988
Citation Numbers： 555 A.2d 901, 521 Pa. 299, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 110
Judges： Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout
Filed Date： 4/7/1989
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/13/2024
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
*300 John C. Pettit and W. Patric Boyer, Pettit and Associates, Washington, for appellant.
Samuel Y. Stroh and Paul W. Stefano, Pittsburgh, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, and STOUT, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
Matter remanded to Commonwealth Court for a determination on the present record of the legal question as to whether the lathe is personalty or realty. Jurisdiction relinquished.
[*] This decision was considered and rendered prior to March 7, 1989.
Canon-McMillan School District v. Bioni , 127 Pa. Commw. 317 ( 1989 )
Wilson v. Ridgway Area School District , 141 Pa. Commw. 607 ( 1991 )
Noll v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc. , 416 Pa. Super. 284 ( 1992 )
Commonwealth v. Bowen , 417 Pa. Super. 340 ( 1992 )
Barto Technical Services, Inc. v. Lawrence (In Re Barto ... , 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 541 ( 1995 )
Commonwealth v. Chiari , 1999 Pa. Super. 270 ( 1999 )
Homrighausen Ex Rel. Homrighausen v. Westinghouse Electric ... , 832 F. Supp. 903 ( 1993 )
Christ v. Prater Industries, Inc. , 67 F. Supp. 2d 491 ( 1999 )