DocketNumber： 93 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1985
Citation Numbers： 511 A.2d 1346, 511 Pa. 148
Judges： Flaherty, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDERMOTT, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Filed Date： 7/15/1986
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 8/23/2023
dissenting.
I dissent. This once again is a classic case which demonstrates the corrosion of the applicability of Rule 1100. Rule 1100 should either be applied by this Court or be abandoned, but to continue its elastic approach does a disservice to the citizens of this Commonwealth and the Constitution which protects them. See Commonwealth v. Terfinko, 504 Pa. 385, 474 A.2d 275 (1984), Zappala, J. dissenting; Commonwealth v. Crowley, 502 Pa. 393, 466 A.2d 1009 (1983), Zappala, J. dissenting; Commonwealth v. Green, 503 Pa. 278, 469 A.2d 552 (1983), Zappala, J. dissenting; Commonwealth v. Manley, 503 Pa. 482, 469 A.2d 1042 (1983), Zappa-