Citation Numbers: 17 A.2d 886, 341 Pa. 47
Judges: PER CURIAM, January 31, 1941:
Filed Date: 1/31/1941
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
It is contended by appellant that the court below abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in granting two new trials in this case. In its opinion following the last trial, the court states, "the interests of right and justice require that this case should be retried." We will not interfere with the action of the trial court under such circumstances:Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.,
Order affirmed. *Page 49
Bellettiere v. Philadelphia , 367 Pa. 638 ( 1951 )
Weinfeld v. Funk , 342 Pa. 160 ( 1941 )
Phillips v. American Stores Co. , 342 Pa. 33 ( 1941 )
Auslander v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. , 350 Pa. 473 ( 1944 )
Rosanoff v. Duquesne University , 365 Pa. 121 ( 1950 )
Ross v. Crisanti , 171 Pa. Super. 117 ( 1952 )
Powell v. Garden Court Corp. , 146 Pa. Super. 372 ( 1941 )
Watson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. , 145 Pa. Super. 369 ( 1941 )
Durdella v. Rothman , 159 Pa. Super. 508 ( 1946 )
Zoni v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. , 153 Pa. Super. 1 ( 1943 )